Do you know about - The Abduction of Scientific Methodology
Physical Therapy Colleges! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.Those supportive of the confidence that alien abductions are an safe bet reality are maybe the most sensitive of the assorted groups to be found in Ufology. While unsupportable speculations in favor of the confidence that persons are for real being abducted by alien beings for hithero unknown purposes are welcomed with petite opposition, an open notification of skeptical disbelief can be thinkable, to meet with some of the most vitriolic and intensely defensive responses.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the actual about Physical Therapy Colleges. You check this out article for information about that need to know is Physical Therapy Colleges.How is The Abduction of Scientific Methodology
This is very noticeable among the many internet message boards and mail lists where petite serious consequence can be expected. It is one of the many contradictions in Ufolgy that such hate and spite filled tirades are launched by these pro abduction advocates so facilely even when responding to the mildest of skeptical inquiry, yet the messages these same proponents claim to have received from their alien mentors and claim to be promoting, are ones of peace and love for ourselves and our planet.
It is as if questioning the validity of these abductees claims is thought about unthinkable and to do so constitutes some form of vile cruelty. More likely, it is the self-operating defense of a confidence held in faith and credulity. It cannot be defended rationally so they must charge to avoid being located in the defensive position; A position which is inherently indefensible. The severe and harsh responses toward skeptical scrutiny of these claims are regularly justified on the grounds that abductees are victims of psychological and bodily traumas at the hands of dreadful alien creatures. Agreeing to them, they should be protected from any unpleasant questioning of their claims, much less be asked to furnish proof.
Really it is petite more than a smokescreen. To me it is in part an effort to capitalize upon and manipulate our deeply ingrained senses of compassion and fear we may feel when confronted with a fellow human being in distress. The feelings of compassion arise from empathy while the fear is more involved yet just as powerful. The fear is due to our not being sure of the psychological consequences if we determine to openly express our doubt as to the abductees credibility or veracity. Whether can conduce significantly to our decisions as to what our responses will be.
This fear may be not just of being wrong but of somehow exacerbating the problems that have resulted in what appears to be an already questionable stability of mind. Inspecting their heavy confidence upon the claims that they are ostracized and ridiculed for their attempts to publicize and therefore somehow solve the riddle of their claimed abductions it isn't an inappropriate suggestion. It appears that it is hoped these intense responses will discourage skeptical exam by playing upon the fear one may have of foremost these emotionally troubled habitancy to additional psychological trauma or even bodily harm.
This is a unjustified concern however in that alien abduction has never been ruled the cause of nervous breakdown or anyone so dramatic as suicide. If this were not the case then it should be safe bet to anyone that these individuals would be much great served seeking competent accepted means of treatment. Not abduction "specialists" and preserve groups where the quiz, of Whether or not they were for real abducted is ignored and instead a group back patting is instituted as therapy. Indeed, the only tangible result of all these experts and preserve groups efforts has been the perpetuation and growth of the enigma. Not a particular step towards a resolution of the problems they claim to touch has been taken. They end up "resigned" to their fate of being abductees and facing additional abductions.
If these habitancy must insist upon continuing to ignore accepted psychological medicine where confidentiality can be assured and instead prefer to place themselves in the spotlight then they must also be willing to accept that their claims are going to be scrutinized to the tiniest detail. If they truly wished to be believed they would doubtless understand that they must be questioned. confidence cannot be forced straight through intimidation or bought straight through compassion. It must be earned by strength of fact or how well the story survives examination.
Concentrating on what I'll loosely call the psychological angle I've noticed what appears to be a serious divergence in the claims regarding the psychological stability of these persons purporting to have been abducted. One of the first things we are told in literature supportive of confidence is that these persons are free of any psychological conditions or neurosis which may characterize to the confidence that they have been abducted.
Yet this seems to be contradicted by some of the very proponents of research which supposedly supports this contention. The late John. E. Mack in his book "Abductions" clearly states his surprise at the estimate of abductees he interviewed who came from families with one or more alcoholic parents. He then mentions many of them arrival from broken homes and expressing feelings of emotional coldness and deprivation within the house structure. He then states roughly offhandedly that some of the abductees feel that aliens are their true parents. The implications this presents seem roughly safe bet even to a layman yet he ignores these and instead goes on to intuit upon the possible implications this has for the family.
To me, these and other cases such as these furnish stark contradiction to the assertions that no psychological pathologies are present that could account for the abduction "experience". It appears as if the implications are ignored in favor of assuming the abduction scenario is real and is a cause to be thought about responsible for the stated problems within the patient's house relationships. Indeed, no real in depth psychological pathology of the patients is carried out in the cases chronicled in his books.
It seems to me that more than a uncomplicated interview with the outpatient would be called for. Yet this is all that appears to be done, after which it is decided the outpatient for real underwent some sort of unusual trauma maybe inspiring aliens because they come across as sincere and it "seems" too real to be faked. After this the research begins in earnest following the assumption that these persons are telling the truth and have been abducted by aliens. This is credible psychological methodology? Further, there are mentioned in "Abductions" past histories of sexual abuse, emotional traumas due to death of loved ones, and in one case a history of seizures and attention deficit disorder although Mack goes to great lengths to dismiss the earlier pathology of other doctors in this last case and attribute these episodes to the abduction experience.
In the cases presented in Mack's book it appears there are for real good reasons to believe there are psychological factors involved that could account for the claims of abductions by aliens. Of procedure these most likely do not account for all reported abductions but I feel they consist of the majority of those where the man relating the touch sincerely feels they are telling the truth as they remember it. I feel this estimate of sincere cases to be very low. Much lower in fact than the numbers so often cited after the now infamous "Roper Poll" which finished they estimate in the millions. I feel this due to the suspicion that the greater estimate of reports are quite maybe a result of copycat and "me too" type reports resulting from the sensational and misleading methods of publication the enigma has been perpetuated with and the faulty methods used in researching it.
The infamous Roper Poll has probably done more to perpetuate confidence in the enigma than any other particular piece of literature in ufology. Authored ostensibly by supporters of the confidence that this is an enigma indicative of alien interaction with human beings, Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum's poll is now thought about by many in the field to be a seminal work. However, as with just about every other piece of work done in this field numerous problems have been uncovered which strongly recommend the poll is flawed beyond salvage.
In reproducing the survey, Ted Goertzel of Rutgers University notes that Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum did not use methods based on internal consistency and that although his sample rate was high with these in place, he noted that while some phenomena was indicated, just what the phenomena is was still unclear. After additional work using the same recipe employed by Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum and adding additional criteria to narrow down the possibilities, he finished that what is for real being indicated was a phenomenon known as cryptomnesia or, a tendency to fabricate false memories.
He also additional finished using path analysis, which he admits is not a transfer for in depth psychological case studies,"The path pathology suggests that cryptomnesia is rooted in a lack of trusting relationships. This qoute may have its origins in early childhood, but it continues into adult life with a lessened feeling of trust of friends and neighbors. This lack of trust leads to feelings of anomie and anxiety which make the personel more likely to fabricate false memories out of data stored in the unconscious mind. habitancy who think in this way are susceptible to confidence in conspiracy theories since these theories help them to make sense of an otherwise incoherent world."
The implications of this come to be even more ominous when coupled with the revelations regarding the use of hypnosis and Rm or repressed memory therapy which is used consistently throughout abduction research. Revelations which show that these two items are themselves very capable of fabricating false memories themselves. The principles behind Rm therapy is not accepted by the Ama or Britain's Royal College of Psychiatry as it has been shown to be severely flawed and capable of causing serious psychological problems. One can only fantasize what the results can be if used on those already susceptible to fabrication of false memories. In fact, I believe the abduction phenomena to characterize a stark example of this, if it is indicative of anything.
The Roper Poll has been found to consist of a immense list of problems, most foremost of which is a bias of confidence on the part of the authors indicated by an unwillingness to consider data negative to their theories. This is suggested as the sole intuit a end of alien abduction is put transmit when yes is answered to the questions in the poll.-see "Journal of Ufo Studies "Rodeghier," "Stefula, Butler and Hansen" (1993: 20), "Karla Turner" and "Alvin Lawson True Believers And Biased Eth Research: The Ffufori/Hopkins "Final Report" On Abductees".
Regarding a end of "alien abduction" being reached due to bias in confidence on the part of Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum:
No rational intuit is obvious to reach such a end yet the assumption is made by the three plainly due to those polled answering yes to 4 or more of the questions on the poll and the three "feeling" this indicates a likely abduction experience. The only justification given is their prior work with abductees; this, despite it being shown that while a phenomenon is being indicated, just what that phenomenon is isn't at all clear. This bias indicates that objectivity is seriously compromised and that the conclusions made by Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum cannot be thought about valid as they have apparently formed a end that fits with their own theories, while excluding notice of entirely plausible alternative possibilities and refusing to check the validity of the same against their findings.
Finishing with the focus upon the favorite research supportive of abduction claims it appears that their use of these questionable theories is the largest contributing factor to the perpetuation of the enigma. The sensational conclusions made using the Roper Poll and their willingness to use discredited theories such as Rm has in my opinion resulted in a steady furnish of attention seekers and charlatans all willing to stand forth as victims of alien abduction.
The only solid truth is that this thing sells. And it brings the attention many seeking it wish to find. In this enigma and the methods employed to validate it those dependent personalities who seek pity and empathy for their discontents have found an ideal haven. They are not thinkable, to prove anything, and they can expect a warm reception from any abductee group they approach. This is maybe the biggest intuit why I feel the actual estimate of those who are sincere in their beliefs that they have been abducted is much lower than that regularly put forth by those such as Mack and Strieber.
More alarming than the attraction the enigma holds for the emotionally discontent however are some researcher's calls for a "new paradigm" and a suspension of current scientific views when addressing this enigma. As a fellow skeptic once mentioned in a seminar forum regarding scientific objectivity and skepticism, "these things plainly must go if the confidence is to survive." Radically altered views in science Whether healing or technological are not without precedent and in truth are welcome if they exhibit a reliable, independently demonstrable nature. But any time this occurs it is due to more than a uncomplicated failure to solve a qoute or a plea for suspension of rationality which it appears this call for a new paradigm is.
The assertions that we should abandon the current scientific worldview in favor of taking a "spiritual intuitive approach" as Mack put's it is plainly without precedent or credible foundation. Claiming this is essential due to a failure on the part of science to furnish answers is absurd. Others have put forth theories supported by replicable research and reliable established precedents such as sleep deadness yet these are ignored. This appears to be an indicator of the earlier mentioned bias on the part of abduction researchers. plainly because they do not like the answers is a good sufficient intuit to abandon accepted scientific methodology and offhandedly dismiss the work of those who bond to it? When it is so sufficient for all things else non paranormal? The justification is nonexistent.
This call for a new paradigm based in spirituality and intuition represents petite more than a wish to return to the dark ages where an accusation of witchcraft was all that was needed to set the villagers to construction up the fire. Fortunately, the develop made towards a rationality based view of the bodily world via scientific methodology is not so for real dislodged. Mack has tried to construe his mental by stating that those comfortable with an Einsteinian-Newtonian view of physics will not believe due to this not allowing their minds to open to the possibilities of other realities or unknown forces. In this effort to dismiss current scientific understanding he entirely misses the mark. It is for real the work of Einstein and others which forms the bedrock of modern physics that has made it possible to seriously consider states of reality other than our own. Before Relativity and extra Relativity were introduced by Einstein, alternate dimensions and states of reality were relegated to pure fantastical speculation.
Einsteinian-Newtonian views of physics make possible the credible notice of alternate realities I might add, without the need to resort some "altered states of consciousness" or the discarding of our current "western scientific worldview", as Mack has put it.
Claiming those who bond to these tenets of physics are incapable of Inspecting alternate states of reality is a blatant effort to dismiss credible scientific methodology. Not surprising Inspecting that the answers such methodology provides are not conducive to belief; not to mention the unfalsifiable nature of the claims the confidence surrounds. This call for a new paradigm based in spirituality and intuition is nothing more than a thinly disguised request for retrial to credulity. They ask for a discharge of current scientific convention in regards to abduction research because they understand that the phenomena cannot fulfill the requirements of scientific methodology. The bar is set too high. So they seek to lower it. Since this is not possible they must request for retrial to some other influence to inspire belief, in short, credulity.
So what of the abductees and their stories themselves? Emphasis has been located heavily upon the fact that abductees characterize stories with strong similarities despite any interaction with each other. This has formed the underpinnings of the traditional assertions that something plainly must be happening to these people. Since they all give similar descriptions of alien beings and the procedures used upon them in their abductions then we must give credence to their claims. But should we? It is the stories themselves which in case,granted the data which has led many to reach a wholly distinct conclusion.
One would expect aliens from a star, galaxy, universe far removed from our own to bond to wholly distinct behavioral and cultural patterns and mannerisms. Yet the themes recurring in these accounts are for real paralleled by our own human standards. The many assorted descriptions of aliens and their activities mirror concepts popularized in mainstream media. This suggests that what is being seen is not independently corroborated evidence of alien abductions but a consistency borne of media influence upon credulous personalities. Studies both inexpressive and academic have born this out and tied in the relationship with media influences unambiguously.
(Susan Blackmore) "Among the adults (though not the children), there was a correlation in the middle of the estimate of television they watched and their knowledge about aliens and abductions. This suggests that the favorite stereotype is obtained more from television programs than from having been abducted by real aliens."
(Glenn G. Sparks, Marianne Pellechia, Chris Irvine)" Because the stories were plainly occurring segments from a network newscast, they also differed in terms of the topic of focus, the habitancy featured, etc. The results revealed that subsequent Ufo beliefs were affected by the story manipulation."
The abduction phenomena despite all of its possible fallacies and contradictions has come to be the most controversial and firmly entrenched of the ufological beliefs. The midpoint abductee claimant is not crazy in the normal sense of the word but does for real display traits which set him apart from those who do not hold such beliefs. He is found to be a credulous personel favoring highly imaginative and sensationalistic views of the world. His disdain for credible scientific study and instant discharge of anyone negative to the confidence reveals to us his basal irrational personality.
He is participating in a fantasy driven enigma, inspiring to those experiencing feelings of powerlessness, inadequacy, fear of mortality, and suffering psychological delusions. The study of Ufos and the Eth has been engaged in for over fifty years. Yet not a scrap of undeniable proof, irrefutable evidence, or
reliable principles has been produced. Coupled with the available data gleaned from psychological study and observational reliability the uncomplicated truth is roughly inescapable. The alien abduction enigma is a goods of human fabricate and origin.
I hope you obtain new knowledge about Physical Therapy Colleges. Where you can offer use in your evryday life. And just remember, your reaction is Physical Therapy Colleges.Read more.. top article The Abduction of Scientific Methodology. View Related articles associated with Physical Therapy Colleges. I Roll below. I have recommended my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share The Abduction of Scientific Methodology.
No comments:
Post a Comment